September 26, 2008
Los ISPs mas grandes de USA piden Opt-IN BT
Posted by: aarrieta In: Marketing Online
La propuesta de los ISP por supuesto no es que el senado regule la practica, si no asegurarles que no tienen por que regular, que ellos cuando decidan comenzar con sus programas de Behavioral Targeting, van a darles a los clientes una descripción detallada y pedirles permiso previamente a traquear sus actividades online.
Los ISPs esta apostando a un negocio mas chico (solo optin y no optout) pero que halla un negocio al fin.
Este acción esta inmersa en el contexto que comentábamos en el post anterior sobre la maduración del mercado de ISPs y lo que esta ocurriendo con Nebu Ad (Modelo opt-out) en USA y Phorn en UK. Donde Phorn ya logro el ok Legal
View Comments to "Los ISPs mas grandes de USA piden Opt-IN BT"
1 | jameshaft
September 26th, 2008 at %H:%M
This is the part that had me laughing:
“However, the ISPs also suggested that legislation is not now needed to protect customer privacy online. Despite a flurry of concern in recent months about some ISPs tracking subscriber activities, lawmakers should give ISPs and Web businesses time to develop a set of best practices for behavioral advertising and information collection, said Tom Tauke, Verizon's executive vice president for public affairs, policy and communications.”
Why not just let them hold our info and our money, and only give it back to us when we ask! lol!
I think that the model should be an open standard, like credit. If you collect information, then the consumer should have the right to review and edit their file and the advertisers should be required to show a link to the database which initiates any contact, so that the consumer can see how the advertiser chose him as a target.
All this should be couched in anonymity, so that only behavioral patterns can be tracked and never personal identity or persona identifiers, like tel numbers, credit cards and ID numbers.
A well designed standard would benefit all users equally.
jh
2 | aarrieta
September 26th, 2008 at %H:%M
Hi James,
yes,It should be couched in anonymity, so that only behavioral patterns can be tracked and never personal identity or persona identifiers, even preferences.
I believe that this technologies is capable to compete with google´s contextual tech.
Cheers,
Ariel
3 | jameshaft
September 26th, 2008 at %H:%M
so let's create the platform and set the standard!
jh
4 | jameshaft
September 26th, 2008 at %H:%M
any contact with the six degrees media folks?
5 | aarrieta
September 26th, 2008 at %H:%M
Sounds great!,
i see the opportunity, looks very clear to me.
We are following the development of this industry very close.
Cheers,
Ariel
6 | jameshaft
September 26th, 2008 at %H:%M
This is the part that had me laughing:
“However, the ISPs also suggested that legislation is not now needed to protect customer privacy online. Despite a flurry of concern in recent months about some ISPs tracking subscriber activities, lawmakers should give ISPs and Web businesses time to develop a set of best practices for behavioral advertising and information collection, said Tom Tauke, Verizon's executive vice president for public affairs, policy and communications.”
Why not just let them hold our info and our money, and only give it back to us when we ask! lol!
I think that the model should be an open standard, like credit. If you collect information, then the consumer should have the right to review and edit their file and the advertisers should be required to show a link to the database which initiates any contact, so that the consumer can see how the advertiser chose him as a target.
All this should be couched in anonymity, so that only behavioral patterns can be tracked and never personal identity or persona identifiers, like tel numbers, credit cards and ID numbers.
A well designed standard would benefit all users equally.
jh
7 | aarrieta
September 26th, 2008 at %H:%M
Hi James,
yes,It should be couched in anonymity, so that only behavioral patterns can be tracked and never personal identity or persona identifiers, even preferences.
I believe that this technologies is capable to compete with google´s contextual tech.
Cheers,
Ariel
8 | jameshaft
September 26th, 2008 at %H:%M
so let's create the platform and set the standard!
jh
9 | jameshaft
September 26th, 2008 at %H:%M
.
10 | aarrieta
September 26th, 2008 at %H:%M
Sounds great!,
i see the opportunity, looks very clear to me.
We are following the development of this industry very close.
Cheers,
Ariel
11 | La EU presiona a Uk para limitar las tecnologias de Phorm | Ariel Arrieta
April 16th, 2009 at %H:%M
[...] NebuAd, quien pretendia seguir el mismo modelo en USA termino agonizando, principalmente por presion… Phorm comenzo con el pie derecho, pero no creo que soporte la presion. Por lo pronto el gobierno de UK dejo pasar la fecha para presentar la defensa de Phorm [...]
12 | La EU presiona a Uk para limitar las tecnologias de Phorm | Marketing viral en internet,afiliados,trafico,ganar dinero,recursos,ventas,negocios,publicidad,adsense...
September 22nd, 2009 at %H:%M
[...] NebuAd, quien pretendia seguir el mismo modelo en USA termino agonizando, principalmente por presion… Phorm comenzo con el pie derecho, pero no creo que soporte la presion. Por lo pronto el gobierno de UK dejo pasar la fecha para presentar la defensa de Phorm [...]
Comment Form